Actor Kim Seung-woo sued for alleged theft of 22 million won

Actor Kim Seung-woo faces a lawsuit for allegedly taking 22 million won in cash from an acquaintance in Cheongdam-dong in October 2021. The allegations surfaced on the 12th, just days after Kim returned to broadcasting as the MC for the TV CHOSUN program "Our Neighborhood Health Champion."

Actor Kim Seung-woo has faced immediate backlash following his return to broadcasting as an MC, as he was sued on allegations of theft. The news that he was accused of taking 22 million won in cash from an acquaintance has cast a shadow over the program he recently joined, with production staff currently assessing the situation to determine whether he will continue his role.

Regarding Kim's appearance on the TV CHOSUN educational program "Our Neighborhood Health Champion," production staff stated on the 13th that they are "currently confirming the situation." Kim recently announced his return to broadcasting after being selected as the main MC for the newly revamped "Our Neighborhood Health Champion." The news of his joining as the new MC was announced on the 6th, and he met viewers through a broadcast on the 9th. He was tasked with leading the program alongside existing MCs Choi Eun-ji and actor Kim Gi-du to deliver health information and daily life stories.

"Our Neighborhood Health Champion" is a program that cheerfully explores life stories anyone can relate to while examining disease warning signs and daily health management methods with experts. While it was expected that Kim, returning to entertainment and educational MC roles after a long hiatus, would provide a new center for the show, his continued appearance has become uncertain due to the criminal case arising immediately after his comeback.

The controversy began when it was revealed on the 12th that Kim had been sued for allegedly taking 22 million won in cash from an acquaintance, A, at an entertainment establishment in Cheongdam-dong, Gangnam District, Seoul, in October 2021. As the criminal complaint was filed approximately five years after the incident occurred, questions have been raised regarding the circumstances of the act, the process of returning the money, and the relationship between the two parties.

Kim's side has completely denied the allegations, claiming the act was a joke occurring within a close friendship rather than theft. His legal representative explained that the incident took place in a public setting in front of everyone present at the drinking session, and there were plans to meet again a few hours later to return the money. They maintained that there was no criminal intent, as there was no intention to illegally acquire another person's money.

The representative further stated that when the parties were unable to meet the following day, Kim immediately returned the amount via bank transfer. It was explained that the two maintained a close relationship like brothers thereafter, and Kim even provided financial help to A when the acquaintance was in a difficult situation. Kim's side announced they would take strong action, stating, "I do not know for what reason the informant is making claims that do not align with the substantive truth and is even filing a criminal complaint."

The legal representative emphasized that they have sufficiently explained the facts to investigative authorities based on relevant data. They also stated a policy to respond to claims that differ from the facts through legal procedures. However, since the lawsuit was made public, various reactions have emerged online regarding the circumstances of the money being taken, the timing of the return, and the relationship between the parties. As the situation currently stands with the complainant's claims clashing against Kim's explanation, the specific facts must be confirmed through the results of the investigation.

The social distancing situation at the time of the incident is also drawing attention. October 2021 was a period when the Seoul Metropolitan Government applied Level 4 social distancing to prevent the spread of COVID-19, and entertainment facilities were included in the prohibition of gatherings. During the same period, actor Choi Jin-hyuk, who visited an entertainment establishment in Gangnam, faced controversy for violating the gathering prohibition and received a summary order of a 500,000 won fine from the Seoul Central District Court. However, in Kim's case, the money-related allegations and whether quarantine rules were violated at the time are separate issues, and specific facts must be confirmed.

This incident, which arose shortly after Kim returned as the MC of a new program, is likely to affect his future broadcasting activities. As the production staff reviews his continued appearance, attention is focused on the progress of the investigation and additional statements from Kim's side.

Kim married actress Kim Nam-joo in 2005 and has one son and one daughter.

Read the original (Korean)