🇺🇸 English 🇯🇵 日本語 🇻🇳 Tiếng Việt
Home › K-Variety › Jun Hyun-moo under fire over rental car timing discrepancy
K-Variety

Jun Hyun-moo under fire over rental car timing discrepancy

Controversy grows as discrepancies emerge between Jun Hyun-moo's 29-hour Almaty trip and a 48-hour rental car reservation shown on screen.

The controversy surrounding Jun Hyun-moo's spontaneous trip to Almaty, Kazakhstan, has resurfaced following scrutiny of a rental car reservation screen. Critics have pointed out that the "29-hour trip" emphasized in the broadcast does not align with the rental car duration shown on screen, leading to calls for verification of how the actual reservation and filming were conducted.

Jun Hyun-moo Faces New Controversy: 29-Hour Trip vs. 48-Hour Car Rental?

On the 6th, a post was uploaded to an online community stating that a supplementary opinion had been submitted to the Korea Communications Standards Commission regarding Jun's Almaty travel broadcast. The author revealed they had also filed a civil complaint through e-People, raising issues by comparing the flight and rental car reservation timeframes shown in the broadcast.

The core of the controversy lies in the discrepancy between the travel time introduced in the broadcast and the rental car reservation time. According to the broadcast, the flight to Almaty taken by Jun departed from Incheon Airport at 11:10 AM on August 6 (Korean time). Korea is four hours ahead of Almaty, and the broadcast explained the flight time from Incheon to Almaty as approximately seven hours.

By simple calculation, the arrival time in Almaty would be around 2:10 PM local time (6:10 PM Korean time). However, the rental car reservation screen shown in the broadcast displayed the rental start time as 9:08 AM.

The complainant questioned this timing. Even when calculated in Korean time, the start time was before the departure from Incheon, and even when converted to Almaty local time, it was about five hours earlier than the expected arrival. Since the vehicle delivery method was marked as "Airport delivery," the complainant argued that verification is needed to understand how such a time was possible if that was indeed when the vehicle was received.

The rental end time is also a focal point. On the reservation screen, the vehicle is shown to be rented for exactly 48 hours, from 9:08 AM on August 6 to 9:08 AM on August 8.

The issue is that the broadcast introduced this trip as a 2-day, 1-night itinerary totaling 29 hours. The complainant demanded that the reason for reserving a 48-hour rental car for a 29-hour trip, as well as the actual points of vehicle pickup and return, be verified through original data.

The fact that the rental company in question reportedly does not offer rentals for less than one day also fueled doubts. The complainant argued that if 48 hours was set due to a minimum rental period, the basis for that must also be verified.

The similarity between the broadcast screen and the company's mobile reservation page was also noted. The complainant stated that the vehicle description, specifications, rental period, delivery method, refund method, and the arrangement of deposit-related items were identical to the company's actual mobile page. They also claimed the vehicle used by Jun in the broadcast matched the appearance of a Hyundai Tucson.

The relationship with domestic schedules has become another subject for verification. SBS conducted the first recording of the first round of "Our Ballad 2" on August 8 and 9, and the cast, including Jun, is known to have participated.

The complainant argued that since the rental end time of 9:08 AM on August 8 would correspond to 1:08 PM in Korea, it must be verified how the schedule of returning the vehicle, returning to Korea, and participating in the domestic recording was actually possible.

However, with only the currently released data, it remains unclear whether these times represent the actual vehicle delivery and return times or were merely scheduled times entered during the reservation process. It is necessary to be cautious about concluding the actual filming and movement routes based solely on the times displayed on a reservation screen.

Previously, the production team explained that there was some prior preparation regarding the spontaneity of the trip. They stated they had pre-issued flight tickets for the staff in preparation for the trip to Kazakhstan and had requested local filming cooperation, planning to cancel those tickets if Jun chose a different destination or could not obtain a ticket.

Regarding the rental car, the production team stated, "Mr. Jun made the reservation directly at Incheon Airport and, after arriving locally, received the vehicle by submitting copies of his passport and international driving permit according to the rental car company's instructions."

The production team also explained that they belatedly realized that a notarization process from the Embassy of Kazakhstan in Korea is required to drive a vehicle in Kazakhstan. They apologized, noting that they failed to sufficiently check relevant regulations before filming.

The most critical aspect of this controversy is the boundary between the "spontaneous trip" narrative and the actual production process. In variety programming, spontaneity does not necessarily mean there was zero preparation, as minimal arrangements are often required for safety and filming.

However, if there is a significant gap between the level of spontaneity perceived by viewers and the actual production process, the situation changes. Specifically, elements like flights and car rentals, which leave a paper trail, serve as objective data to verify whether the broadcast narrative matches the actual proceedings.

The complainant argued that since the production team admitted to securing staff flights in advance, the timing of the rental car reservation should also be verified. While the broadcast emphasized finding transportation after booking the flight, the initial creation and final confirmation times of the rental reservation have not been disclosed.

Furthermore, the complainant noted that the process of finalizing the rental reservation was not clearly visible on screen. This has led to questions regarding whether the broadcast showed the actual reservation procedure or if certain scenes were reconstructed to emphasize spontaneity.

The complainant cited a past instance where Jun addressed suspicions regarding a medical IV scene by releasing his 2016 medical records, arguing that objective time records, excluding personal information, could resolve the current issue.

Currently, it is difficult to reach a conclusion based solely on one side's claims. Key data—such as whether the 48-hour window was the actual rental duration, when the reservation was confirmed, when the vehicle was picked up and returned, and when Jun departed Almaty—has not yet been made public.

Ultimately, this controversy is not just about the numbers. It is about determining where the broadcast's emphasis on spontaneity meets the actual production process and which parts were part of the variety show's direction.

If the rental car reservation data, actual rental/return records, flight records, and filming schedules are verified during the upcoming review process, many of the current questions may be answered objectively. At this stage, it is only certain that allegations have been raised and that the production team has provided an initial explanation.

O
Oh Seo-yoon
Mediafine Global · 기자
More by this reporter ›
Copyright © Mediafine Global All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction, redistribution, and AI training prohibited.
Share Facebook X (Twitter) KakaoStory

Comments 0

Be the first to comment.