Kim Seon-ho sparks 'Photoshop' debate with award ceremony photos
Fans voice concerns over digital retouching in Kim Seon-ho's recent behind-the-scenes photos from the 2026 K-WORLD DREAM AWARDS.
As behind-the-scenes photos of actor Kim Seon-ho from a recent award ceremony were released, fans' attention shifted away from his fashion or recent activities and toward the apparent digital retouching applied to the images. An unexpected 'Photoshop controversy' erupted as some fans, who prefer a more natural look, voiced opinions asking to 'reduce the retouching.'

On the 28th, his agency Fantagio released behind-the-scenes photos of Kim Seon-ho attending the '2026 K-WORLD DREAM AWARDS' via official SNS. On this day, Kim attended the ceremony, taking the stage as a presenter to hand out trophies to the winners.
In the released photos, Kim is dressed in a black suit, staring into the camera while holding a cue card. His neatly styled hair and clean suit create a refined image suitable for an official award ceremony.
However, after the photos were released, some fans focused on a different aspect. Rather than Kim's appearance itself, opinions emerged that the retouching applied to his skin and facial contours appeared stronger than in photos typically released.
Through comments, some fans left reactions such as, "Please use Photoshop moderately," "Please reduce the retouching a little," and "I wish you wouldn't retouch the face." It appears that the standard retouching work used in pictorials and promotional photos to make a star look more perfect was instead received as unfamiliar by fans.
However, it is difficult to confirm exactly how much digital retouching was applied to the actual photos based solely on the released images. This is because skin texture and facial contours can be expressed quite differently depending on the lighting, lens, exposure, color correction, and the shooting environment at the time of capture.
Furthermore, the judgment of whether 'retouching is excessive' is not a claim that can be measured with objective figures. This is why perspectives inevitably clash between those who see the same photo as natural and those who feel it looks artificial.
What makes this reaction interesting is that fans do not necessarily demand a more perfected version of Kim. Rather, some fans expressed through comments that they prefer the naturalness felt in the actor's original expressions and face over a formal, polished image.
This aligns with the recent trend in the entertainment industry of star marketing centered around a 'flawless image.' As high-resolution cameras and image editing technologies become commonplace, official celebrity photos often serve not just to record their actual appearance but are processed as a form of visual content. Refining skin texture and smoothing facial contours is also a common practice in the promotional process.
However, as fandom consumption patterns change, an atmosphere is emerging where such practices are not unconditionally accepted. In particular, fans who have followed an actor for a long time tend to find the natural appearance revealed in daily photos and videos more relatable than pictorial or advertisement images.
The recent Kim Seon-ho photos can be interpreted in a similar context. For some fans, a photo that looks 'like Kim Seon-ho' was more important than a 'better-looking photo.'
Of course, not all fans reacted negatively to the retouching. Some argued that it is difficult to conclude whether retouching occurred based only on the released photos, and since it was an official event like an award ceremony, some viewed a certain degree of image retouching as a natural part of the promotional process. In fact, the comment reactions were not unilaterally gathered toward one side.
Ultimately, a single photo released to share news of Kim's recent activities as a presenter seems to have turned into an unexpected topic of conversation. As fans' demands regarding the 'naturalness' of the photos drew more attention than Kim's neat appearance at the ceremony, it has led to a small debate over how much a star's image should be refined and where it should be shown as it is.
Comments 0