Hey Jini controversy grows after phone recording released amid accident claim

A phone recording released on the 27th shows YouTuber Hey Jini appearing to admit to questioning the authenticity of a former employee's illness. The recording comes as "A" claims the company obstructed an industrial accident application following panic disorder caused by working up to 16 hours a day.

The controversy surrounding kids' YouTuber Hey Jini and a former employee's industrial accident claim is intensifying following the release of a phone recording between the two parties. The recording reportedly contains a segment where Hey Jini appears to admit to questioning whether an employee's illness was genuine in an opinion statement submitted by the company to the Korea Workers' Compensation & Welfare Service. As the former employee claims to have been recognized for an industrial accident after suffering from panic disorder due to long working hours, debate is expected to continue regarding the company's attitude during the application process.

On the 27th, YouTuber Lee Jin-ho released a phone recording of a conversation between Hey Jini and a former employee, referred to as "A." In the recording, A asks whether the company included language in the opinion statement submitted to the Korea Workers' Compensation & Welfare Service suggesting they "doubted if the person was truly ill." The controversy erupted as the recording includes a portion where Hey Jini appears to admit to this content.

It remains necessary to verify the specific context in which the phrase was recorded in the actual opinion statement and from what perspective the company reviewed the employee's industrial accident application through concrete data. However, with the company's response to the employee's illness and accident claim under scrutiny, the allegation that expressions doubting the authenticity of the illness were used is sparking significant debate.

Previously, A claimed to have worked up to 16 hours a day at the company and suffered from panic disorder during this process. A explained that the industrial accident was subsequently recognized. Furthermore, A has raised issues by claiming the company obstructed the application process, such as by proposing a settlement of 4 million won. This suggests that the issues regarding the labor environment have extended into conflicts during the industrial accident application process.

In contrast, Hey Jini's side is denying the allegations of obstructing the industrial accident application. The company stated, "We did not obstruct the industrial accident application," countering that they actually arranged for the employee to consult with an external labor attorney. They also mentioned that they provided considerations for working conditions, such as annual salary increases and support for housing deposits, during the period of employment. The company has expressed its intention to resolve the current controversy through dialogue.

The claims of both sides clash over whether the company took specific measures for the employee during the application process and whether those measures effectively obstructed the claim. Even if the company provided support to improve welfare or treatment, that alone does not fully explain the appropriateness of the industrial accident application process. Conversely, the existence of certain expressions in the phone recording does not definitively prove the overall allegations of obstructing the accident claim. This is why the related documents, the full conversation, and the specific circumstances must be examined together.

This controversy is drawing attention because it involves a conflict between the business management practices of a famous creator, who has built a familiar image through children's content, and the labor rights of an employee. As the bright and friendly image shown to the public and the actual labor environment within the organization are separate issues, the reality of the allegations should be determined through concrete facts rather than emotional disputes.

With the release of the phone recording amid the conflict over the industrial accident, attention is focused on Hey Jini's response and additional claims from A. However, as the content released so far is based on the positions of both sides and partial recordings, caution is required before making a definitive judgment regarding the obstruction of the application and related responsibilities. The core of the controversy lies beyond whether certain expressions were used, focusing instead on whether the worker's legitimate rights were guaranteed during the process of reporting illness and applying for an industrial accident.

Read the original (Korean)